Now showing at the 7Cinemalaya 2011, Amok was one of three full-length movies we (JC and three friends) watched last Saturday. By far, it was the fairest of them all.
Going to Cinemalaya has been a yearly birthday grace for me through my boys. In all those years, there have been films that really stand out —films that raise the bar and make me proud to be a Pinoy.
This year, Amok, makes me immensely proud. (I still have not watched some of the movies like the much-touted Ang Babae sa Septic Tank and Patikul in the competition, but thus far, Amok is already in a class by itself.)
The theater was crowded so we took seats separate from each other, but when we finally got together after the movie, we were one in our squeals of excitement: “Excellent!”
It was directed by an idealistic young man, Lawrence “Law” Fajardo, who has yet to perfect his spoken Filipino. He hails from Bacolod so that explains the language difficulty. But that's only when you hear him speak (he and the production staff took time to take questions after the showing). Watching his film, you know he is a master of Manila's soul.
My main complaint over Filipino films, in general, is the pacing. Editors love to linger and dawdle on a scene, over-explaining and making it a tad too—well, boring.
But Amok cuts and cuts—at the right places, just when your emotion is on a high gear. The first half is a series of vignettes reflecting real people's heart and soul, and I say to myself, “How on earth is the director ever going to put all these riveting—but totally unrelated—mini conflicts together?”
Fajardo does. He seamlessly puts them all into a powerful, unified whole. Little wonder, he himself is the editor, who is deep into TV ads.
All the elements in the movie contribute to making it gasp-enducing: 1) Cast. “Acting,” as Stanislavski puts it, “is believing.” All the characters (Mark Gil, take a bow) are believable; 2) Concept. Every frame—close-up, medium shot, and long shot—enhances the temper's quick rise to boiling point; 3) Framing. Never dull, never predictable; 4) Editing. Fierce, fast, and fiery; 5) Direction. Sensitive and incisive; 6) Tonality. It deftly combines suspense, gore, and humor.
And oh, what a charming creative touch on the graffiti: I AM OK.
But Amok cuts and cuts—at the right places, just when your emotion is on a high gear. The first half is a series of vignettes reflecting real people's heart and soul, and I say to myself, “How on earth is the director ever going to put all these riveting—but totally unrelated—mini conflicts together?”
Fajardo does. He seamlessly puts them all into a powerful, unified whole. Little wonder, he himself is the editor, who is deep into TV ads.
All the elements in the movie contribute to making it gasp-enducing: 1) Cast. “Acting,” as Stanislavski puts it, “is believing.” All the characters (Mark Gil, take a bow) are believable; 2) Concept. Every frame—close-up, medium shot, and long shot—enhances the temper's quick rise to boiling point; 3) Framing. Never dull, never predictable; 4) Editing. Fierce, fast, and fiery; 5) Direction. Sensitive and incisive; 6) Tonality. It deftly combines suspense, gore, and humor.
And oh, what a charming creative touch on the graffiti: I AM OK.
In addition to the director (the long-haired man in red whom we sought out for this photo op), kudos goes to: Screenplay, John Bedia; Script Consultant, Paul Sta. Ana; Executive Producer, Krisma Fajardo; Director of Photography, Louie Quirino; Producers, Tessa Aquino and Lawrence Fajardo; Asst. Director, Jobin Ballesteros; Production Designer, Lawrence Fajardo; Production Managers, Philip Buena and Ron Capili; Editor, Lawrence Fajardo; and Sound, Mike Idioma.
The only hiccup in my litany of praises (at the risk of being branded a prissy prude) is: the bed scene.
Snipping away some 60-seconds of overt footage will not diminish the art nor the drama. All one needs is a few seconds to get the point. Overstating the creative intent often drags fluid storytelling.
The only hiccup in my litany of praises (at the risk of being branded a prissy prude) is: the bed scene.
Snipping away some 60-seconds of overt footage will not diminish the art nor the drama. All one needs is a few seconds to get the point. Overstating the creative intent often drags fluid storytelling.
Squatting in line for the next movie |
2 comments:
i totally missed it! ARGGG!
There will be additional screening in some places after the festival. Watch out for announcements.
Post a Comment